Thursday, 10 November 2022

Why are we so scared of Robots?

Hello, readers! I am Divya Parmar and I welcome you all to read my blog. This blog is based on several videos and I will write my views after watching those videos. 

1 . Babysitter robot: 


Robots are man made. We humans only fix things in it; they don't have their own emotions like human beings . The whole movie is about how the robot is connected with a human child and when the mother replaces them he comes back to take revenge like a human. We are afraid of such robots but in reality we humans make such inventions to make our workload easy and we only get afraid of our own creation. 

2. IMom - mom


Second Movie is imom. It's a very interesting movie to study for our question. This is a very interesting movie. The imom basically cooked grace, the second child who was an infant because the mother had earlier called her "my little chicken" and had previously given instructions to imom that she was to cook the chicken. The whole video revolves around the concept of corruption through replacing humans with artificial intelligence. This is very fascinating to see that we want to replace humans with robots. We are scared because of this kind of incident with robots.  

3. Satyajit Ray's short story 'Anukul' (1976) - directed by Sujoy  


The film is set in an
 undefined time in the future where human behavior towards robots are the present. The robots are taking up jobs from human beings and the world seems to be divided between those who support the new technology and those who don't .Nikunj Chaturvedi (played by Saurabh Shukla), a school teacher, supports the advanced technology and employs Anukul (Parambrata Chatterjee) as a house help. Nikunj's cousin Ratan (Kharaj Mukherjee), who lost his job to a robot, is against his brother's new employee and attacks him at the first opportunity. Nikunj, who helps Anukul understand the Bhagwat Gita, respects Anukul for helping him out with the daily chores even after he too loses his teaching job to a robot. In an unfortunate (or so it seems) Ratan dies after Anukul gives him an electric shock. 

Future of postcolonialial Studies


Future of postcolonialial Studies 

Hello, I am Divya Parmar and i warmly welcome you all to read my blog.  Writing this blog for the essays “Future of Post-Colonial Studies”. Which is given by Dr.Pro. Dilip Barad sir for the unit 4. Here we have to discuss the essays summaries and all the things. 



1.Conclusion: Globalisation and The Future of Postcolonial Studies



This book ‘Colonialism and Postcolonialism’ is by Ania Loomba. In this book she has discussed many things like, key features of the ideologies and history of colonialism, the relationship of colonial discourse to literature, challenges to colonialism, including anticolonial discourses, recent developments in postcolonial theories and histories, issues of sexuality and colonialism, and the intersection of feminist and postcolonial thought, debates about Globalisation and postcolonialism. Postcolonial scholarship now has an even more urgent role to play in making these links visible in the contemporary world.

The conclusion of the book is start like this,

Since the events of 11 September 2001, the so-called global war on terror, and the US invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq, it is harder than ever to see our world as simply ‘postcolonial’. Like the wild tone of Globalisation Ania Loomba has given here. And she has mentioned many names of the critics who is related to the Globalisation.

Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri’s Empire argues that the contemporary global order has produced a new form of sovereignty which should be called ‘Empire’ but which is best understood in contrast to European empires: In contrast to imperialism, Empire establishes no territorial center of power and does not rely on fixed boundaries or barriers. It is a decentered and deterritorializing apparatus of rule that progressively incorporates the entire global realm within its open, expanding frontiers. Empire manages hybrid identities, flexible hierarchies, and plural exchanges through modulating networks of command. The distinct national colors of the imperial map of the world have merged and blended in the imperial global rainbow. (Hardt and Negri 2000: xiii–xiii)

By this argument one can get the understanding of the new Empire is better compared to the Roman Empire rather than to European colonialism, since imperial Rome also loosely incorporated its subject states rather than controlling them directly according to Hardt and Negri.

Arjun Appadurai’s Modernity at Large,

catalogues of ‘multiple locations’ and new hybridities, new forms of communication, new foods, new clothes and new patterns of consumption are offered as evidence for both the newness and the benefits of globalisation.

Simon Gikandi gave the terms of postcolonial studies such as ‘hybridity’ and ‘difference’,

‘It is premature to argue that the images and narratives that denote the new global culture are connected to a global structure or that they are disconnected from earlier or older forms of identity. In other words, there is no reason to suppose that the global flow in images has a homological connection to transformation in social or cultural relationships’ (Gikandi 2001: 632; emphasis added).

Atienne Balibar - Racism and Nationalism

For Balibar, the new racial ideologies are not less rigid simply because they invoke culture instead of nature; rather, we see today that ‘culture can also function like a nature’ and can be equally pernicious (Balibar 1991a: 22). Phobia about Arabs today, he writes, ‘carries with it an image of Islam as a “conception of the world” which is incompatible with Europeanness’ (24)

Samuel Huntington - Clash of Civilization


Here they talk about the Jews and Muslim people or countries. it is no accident that it is Muslims who are regarded as barbaric and given to acts of violence and Asians who are seen as diligent but attached to their own rules of business and family, both modes of being which are seen as differently incommensurate with the Western world.

P. Sainath – ‘And then there was the market’

Market fundamentalism destroys more human lives than any other simply because it cuts across all national, cultural, geographic, religious and other boundaries. It’s as much at home in Moscow as in Mumbai or Minnesota. A South Africa – whose advances in the early 1990s thrilled the world – moved swiftly from apartheid to neo-liberalism. It sits as easily in Hindu, Islamic or Christian societies. And it contributes angry, despairing recruits to the armies of all religious fundamentalisms. Based on the premise that the market is the solution to all the problems of the human race, it is, too, a very religious fundamentalism. It has its own Gospel: The Gospel of St. Growth, of St. Choice… (2001: n.p.)

An Indian research group’s argument

The great range of actual measures carried on under the label of globalization … were not those of integration and development. Rather they were the processes of imposition, disintegration, underdevelopment and appropriation. They were of continued extraction of debt servicing payments of the third world; depression of the prices of raw materials exported by the same countries; removal of tariff protection for their vulnerable productive sectors; removal of restraints on foreign direct investment, allowing giant foreign corporations to grab larger sectors of the third world’s economies; removal of restraints on the entry and exit of massive flows of speculative international capital, allowing their movements to dictate economic life; reduction of State spending on productive activity, development and welfare; privatization of activities, assets and natural resources, sharp increases in the cost of essential services and goods such as electricity, fuel, health care, education, transport, and food (accompanied by the harsher depression of women’s consumption within each family’s declining consumption); withdrawal of subsidized credit earlier directed to starved sectors; dismantling of workers’ security of employment; reduction of the share of wages in the social product; suppression of domestic industry in the third world and closures of manufacturing firms on a massive scale; ruination of independent small industries; ruination of the handicrafts/handloom sector; replacement of subsistence crops with cash crops; destruction of food security. (Research Unit for Political Economy, 2003: n.p.)

Point can be noted that globalisation has given new divisions as well as new opportunities to the global level.

‘Globalization is just another name for submission and domination’, Nicanor Apaza, 46, an unemployed miner, said at a demonstration this week in which Indian women … carried banners denouncing the International Monetary Fund and demanding the president’s resignation. ‘We’ve had to live with that here for 500 years, and now we want to be our own masters.’

Here is a report from The New York Times (Friday October 17, 2003) speaking of huge demonstrations in La Paz which defied military barricades to protest a plan to export natural gas to the United States.

Joseph E Stiglitz, has point out that how the idea of ‘Market Fundamentalism’ is working in a way. The words are here,

The international financial institutions have pushed a particular ideology—market fundamentalism—that is both bad economics and bad politics; it is based on premises concerning how markets work that do not hold even for developed countries, much less for developing countries. The IMF has pushed these economic policies without a broader vision of society or the role of economics within society. And it has pushed these policies in ways that have undermined emerging democracies. More generally, globalization itself has been governed in ways that are undemocratic and have been disadvantageous to developing countries, especially the poor within those countries. (2002: n.p.)

Also, here we find the problematic tone of imperialists,

Niall Ferguson proclaims that he has been openly championing the idea of a US empire for many years now, because ‘capitalism and democracy are not naturally occurring but require strong institutional foundations of law and order. The proper role of an imperial America is to establish these institutions where they are lacking, if necessary … by military force.’

Thinking Skills

Thinking skills 

Hello, readers! I am Divya Parmar and I welcome you all to read my blog. This blog is based upon a thinking skill workshop by Milan pandya sir. 

"Thinking about thinking in order to improve thinking" - Prof.Milan Pandya. 


Department of English, Maharaja Krishnakumarsinhji Bhavnagar University, Gujarat organized academic workshops yearly. This year we had a fantastic two-day workshop on Thinking Skills, conducted by Prof.Dr.Milan Pandya Sir. 

Milan Pandya is a teacher, trainer, and educator in the field of Thinking Skills i.e. Critical, Creative and Design Thinking, English Language Teaching & Communication Skills. With more than 12 years of teaching experience, Mr. Pandya has authored 02 books and presented and published a number of research papers in national and international conferences and journals. He has taught/trained in numerous Universities/Institutions training more than 30,000 people in Thinking Skills across world.
Mr. Pandya has BA & MA in English Literature, M.Phil in English Language Teaching (ELT) & his Ph.D involves study in Online Teaching, Communicative Competence & Critical Thinking. He currently holds a position of Vice President of Advancement at Critical Thinking Solutions company in Ontario, Canada, and teaches at multiple colleges such as Conestoga and Sheridan College in Ontario, Canada.



13 August 2022 is the first day of the Workshop. Basically, we just heard the word thinking skill, but after coming to the department we did and doing our task as a thinking activity to explore our creative and critical thinking. But the workshop gives more insight about thinking in a Logical, Rational, and Scientifically way. This trio of the process of doing critical thinking is very much necessary while attempting the criticism in a certain way. 

Why Logical, Rational, and Scientifically? 

As per what I understand of Critical thinking, these three notions give the accurate value of the answer to the arguments. This also helps to understand the arguments in a more clear way by proving the thing. Reasonable answers give moral support to the argument. With the essence of logic in the argument, the process of answering it has become more clear while reaching the final stage of the argument. So, these three concepts of critical thinking are very much necessary when attempting such a critical argument. 
The Lecture also gave such wonderful examples which help to understand the critical thinking process in an easier way. There is Context and Proof are very much necessary to organize the final stage of our argument. These are important ornaments that make the argument in more beautiful way. Here I want to explain some examples that sir gave: 

For Context, we introduced in detail through living examples and advertisements. Knowing the context helps 50% of our argument. The Lecture also gave an example of a soap advertisement which is starring by celebrities. In that the critics argue might arise that why one wealthy man doing advertise of cheap things like soaps which are available within 30 or 40 rupees! 
Another example like, one recent tweet by Indian Film actor Shatish Shah, (the photo is in the center, given in the above collage at the bottom row). He posted on his tweeter account, "The very same TIRANGA DHWAJ my mother had got during Quite India Movement 1942). And then people are doing to fact change. The very next image is showing that one man and one is probably his children who riding the bicycle. The woman is doing sewing at the center and the little girl is enjoining the ride. It seems very useful but as harmful also. Also one can see binaries between man and woman.
We also come to know about a new word, which is quite important in thinking skills:
Other examples like Shraddha Kapoor's post on Indian Soldier. 



This photo was posted in 2017Along with Shraddha Kapoor, BJP MP Kirron Kher also posted a fake photo. The photo is not actually of Indian army soldiers but of Russian Army Soldiers. So it describes that, 
"If something is true, what else has to be true in that" 
It is also worth notice that how much we invest in the self while writing and marketing or attempting criticism. Opinions also make us confused to do fact-checking. However, no one is critical-minded by born. One has to practice and keep thinking by questioning in a certain way. 
The next day on 14 Aug 2022 we learned Creative thinking through several interesting activities. 

From this image, we are supposed to create categories that will be something beyond normal categories like food, Money, and other things. I found several categories like Life and Death, Science and Technology, Music and Painting, Money and Banking, and Weapons. Lecturer also gave some more keys to connect like with song, literature, Idioms, and Phrases. With literature, I also found one novel by Kazuo Ishiguro 'An Artist of the Floating World', and very famous thoughts 'Art for the sake of Art.' Lecturer also shows another image like a toothbrush and gave the task to think more about ways of its use. Mind is immediately connected with obvious use or thing. Attempting something creative we have to see beyond the common thing, it is the primary purpose of creative thinking. We also come to know that creativity is trained in your mind in what others can not able to do. And also have patience while doing something creative activity. We also practiced through some situations and dilemma given by the lecturer, Like Trollyology. 


After attending such interesting sessions, I come to know that Studying criticism is very hard while we try to attempt certain theories in our life. To break the construction without breaking its value is very much necessary while attempting criticism. It depends on how much you invest yourself in the thinking process. The process also consumes time, it is necessary to have patience. Thanking to the head of the department, Prof.Dr.Dilip Barad sir for organizing the workshop. 

Machine Translation


Hello readers! I am Divya Parmar and I welcome you all to read my blog. This blog is part of our class activity. In that activity we were supposed to write one write up and we translated it into Bengali by Google Translate. And then we have an online meeting with one Bengali Native who reads our write ups and suggests us the right translation.

This activity is part of The learning of the novel 'Home and The World ' by Rabindranath Tagore 
Work in English: politics!

Politics, politics, politics it is spreaded everywhere,
You don't have a chance to escape from it anywhere.
Yes, Education is different from politics,
But you have to pay a donation!
Yes, Religion is seems far away from politics,
But for publicity purposes please visit religious places!

Bengali Translation

রাজনীতি, রাজনীতি, রাজনীতি সর্বত্র ছড়িয়ে আছে,
আপনার কোথাও এটি থেকে পালানোর সুযোগ নেই।
হ্যাঁ, শিক্ষা রাজনীতি থেকে আলাদা,
কিন্তু আপনি একটি অনুদান দিতে হবে!
হ্যাঁ, ধর্মকে রাজনীতি থেকে অনেক দূরে মনে হয়,
কিন্তু প্রচারের উদ্দেশ্যে ধর্মীয় স্থান পরিদর্শন করুন! 





For by J. M. Coetzee


Foe by J. M. Coetzee 

Using the 1719 English novel Robinson Crusoe as a jumping-off point, South African author J.M. Coetzee’s novel Foe (1986) tells the story of castaway Susan Barton who enlists the real-life author Daniel Defoe (referred to here by his birth name, "Daniel Foe") to help render her tale into a work of popular fiction. According to New York Times journalist Patrick McGrath, the book's major theme concerns the "linkage of language and power, the idea that those without voices cease to signify, figuratively and literally."

About J. M. Coetzee:
John Maxwell Coetzee was born in Cape Town, South Africa, on 9 February 1940, the elder of two children. His mother was a primary school teacher. His father was trained as an attorney, but practiced as such only intermittently; during the years 1941–45 he served with the South African forces in North Africa and Italy. Though Coetzee’s parents were not of British descent, the language spoken at home was English.

Coetzee received his primary schooling in Cape Town and in the nearby town of Worcester. For his secondary education he attended a school in Cape Town run by a Catholic order, the Marist Brothers. He matriculated in 1956.

Coetzee entered the University of Cape Town in 1957, and in 1960 and 1961 graduated successively with honours degrees in English and mathematics. He spent the years 1962–65 in England, working as a computer programmer while doing research for a thesis on the English novelist Ford Madox Ford.

In 1963 he married Philippa Jubber (1939–1991). They had two children, Nicolas (1966–1989) and Gisela (b. 1968).

In 1965 Coetzee entered the graduate school of the University of Texas at Austin, and in 1968 graduated with a PhD in English, linguistics, and Germanic languages. His doctoral dissertation was on the early fiction of Samuel Beckett.

For three years (1968–71) Coetzee was assistant professor of English at the State University of New York in Buffalo. After an application for permanent residence in the United States was denied, he returned to South Africa. From 1972 until 2000 he held a series of positions at the University of Cape Town, the last of them as Distinguished Professor of Literature.

Between 1984 and 2003 he also taught frequently in the United States: at the State University of New York, Johns Hopkins University, Harvard University, Stanford University, and the University of Chicago, where for six years he was a member of the Committee on Social Thought.

Summary of the novel:

In the early eighteenth century, Susan Barton awakens to find herself washed up on the shore of an unknown island. When a man of African descent approaches her, Susan fears he is a cannibal intent on killing and eating her. Rather than causing her harm, the man—whose name, we learn, is Friday—carries Susan on his back up a hill. There, Susan meets Friday's companion, Cruso, a white man who speaks English. Though Friday seems to understand English, he does not speak at all.

Susan explains to the two men how she ended up on the island: She had been in Bahia in South America, searching for her daughter who had been kidnapped. After staying there for two years and working as a seamstress, Susan gave up her search and hitched a ride on a merchant ship headed to England. While on the ship, she had a sexual relationship with the captain. One day, the ship's crew staged a mutiny, killing their captain and assaulting Susan. After the mutineers have their way with Susan, they cast her off in a rowboat along with the captain's dead body. After rowing for some time until her hands were covered in blisters, she spotted the island and attempted to swim to it, eventually losing consciousness along the way. 

On the island, Cruso and Friday share a small hut and subsist on lettuce and fish. They allow Susan to sleep in the hut with them, warning her not to wander off alone. The island, Cruso claims, is inhabited by wild, vicious apes. Cruso struggles to explain how he and Friday ended up on the island, and Susan suspects that the years of isolation have caused him to go mad. She also learns why Friday never speaks: He was a slave whose owners cut out his tongue when he was a child.

Over the next few months, the three survive amicably, though Susan is maddened by the fact that neither Cruso nor Friday seems to have any desire to leave the island. Susan is also frustrated by the pointless tasks Cruso busies himself with, like building terraces even though there is nothing to plant. One night, Cruso makes a half-hearted sexual advance toward Susan. At first, she is repulsed, reminded of the trauma she experienced on the ship. Later, she tells Cruso he can be with her sexually if he wishes. Cruso never makes another pass at Susan, and Susan doesn't press the issue. Meanwhile, Cruso suffers from recurring fevers.

About a year passes, and a ship finally comes to their rescue. At the advice of the captain, Susan pretends to be Cruso's wife and Friday their slave. Before the ship reaches England, Cruso's fever worsens, and he dies in a fit of depression, mourning his island home. Back in London, Susan contacts the famous writer, Daniel Foe, for help in writing her story, but the two sharply disagree over what to include in the book. Susan believes the story should focus on how she, Cruso, and Friday survived on the island. Foe thinks readers would be bored by such a story and insists that Susan tell him more about her time in Bahia, but she refuses. 

One day, Susan arrives at Foe's house to find that he has abandoned it to avoid creditors. She and Friday move into Foe's house, grow their own food in his garden, and sell off many of his belongings. Over time, Susan begins to feel a great deal of empathy for Friday who, she later learns, was also castrated by slavers. Hoping to send Friday back to his home in Africa, Susan travels with him by foot from London to the port town of Bristol, sleeping in barns and living like "gypsies." By the time they reach Bristol, the two are filthy and haggard. Susan realizes her plan is deeply flawed and that Friday will just be sold back into slavery if he is found on a ship.

Back in London, Susan reconnects with Foe who has returned home. He continues to badger her about her time in Bahia, believing that the scandalous tale of her ruined womanhood will delight readers. Again, Susan refuses to tell this story, reiterating her position that the story should be about the island and, more specifically, Friday's experiences. She feels a strong responsibility to tell the story of Friday because he has no voice to tell it himself. Foe suggests teaching Friday to write, but when given a slate and a piece of chalk, Friday simply covers it with O’s. That night, Susan and Foe have sex.

The book ends with a dream-like passage revisiting events from the first chapter. Rather than swim to the shore of the island, Susan plummets to the bottom of the sea where she finds a wrecked ship. Next to the ship's stern, Friday's body is lodged in the sand and covered in chains. Susan opens his mouth, and he finally "speaks," emitting a stream of water, “Soft and cold, dark and unending, it beats against my eyelids, against the skin of my face.” 

Foe is a powerful and philosophical tale about how stories are told, and who has the privilege of telling them. 

Q-1)How would you differentiate the character of Cruso and Crusoe?


This Robinson Crusoe is much more in tune with his own reality and interested in his own accomplishments than Foe's Cruso. This is also evident in the number of tools and objects that Robinson Crusoe makes in comparison to Cruso.


Robinson Crusoe’s name is changed to “Cruso” which marks the first in a series of differences between the character of Cruso(e) in Foe and Robinson Crusoe. The Cruso that Susan describes in the quote is one who is completely disconnected from reality and confused about his own past. When Susan questions Cruso about his history on the island the details in his stories vary wildly each time they are told. When asked if Friday was a child when he came to the island Cruso would sometimes exclaim, “Aye, a child, a mere child”, but other times Cruso would say, “Friday was a cannibal whom he had saved from being roasted”. This uncertainty about events could stem from the fact that in Foe, Cruso is very against keeping written documentation of his days on the island; proclaiming,


 “Nothing I have forgotten is worth remembering”.


Cruso’s lack of journaling is a stark contrast to Defoe’s Robinson Crusoe. Robinson Crusoe is much less passive and senile in regards to his own development on the island. Crusoe kept a painfully detailed account of every action he does on the island in a journal he updates daily. Robinson Crusoe fills his multiple homes with various types of pots, tables, chairs, fences, and even a canoe. All of these items Crusoe builds are to improve and aide in his growth on the island, and he must be mentally sharp in order to build these items. Cruso in Foe has not put any effort towards building tools, as he only has a bed when Susan arrives at the island, and from the quote, it seems like he may not have the mental capacity to build these tools. Although Cruso does builds many terraces, he exclaims that they are for the future generations and not himself.


The difference in mindset and mental stability in the two Robinson Crusoe’s may be that in Robinson Crusoe, Crusoe felt that his island life had more value than Cruso did. Before becoming stranded on the island, religion wasn’t a focus in Robinson Crusoe’s life, and he frequently sinned; such as when he disobeyed his father. After becoming stranded on the island, Crusoe began to read the bible and incorporate God into his daily thoughts and actions. Crusoe expressed deep regret for his sinful past, and often attributed hardships to a lesson from God. This newfound lifestyle gave significant meaning to Crusoe’s daily actions as they represented growth in his faith, and a positive change in character. For Cruso, the island did not lead him to make any significant changes in his character or ideals. Therefore, his daily actions had less significance to him, and when his reality and sense of self began to slip away from him he was not concerned.


Q-2) Friday’s characteristics and persona in Foe and in Robinson Crusoe. 



Friday doesn’t need help, in reality, he’s a more complete and complex character in both Robinson Crusoe and Foe than any other character. Even Daniel DeFoe and J.M. Coetzee creates the illusion that the white European heroes in each of the stories know better than Friday and that their stories are more compelling than his, it can be argued, neither story's protagonists know best; in spite of the rampant white saviour complex and promotion of colonisation ideology.


Friday slowly emerges as the heart of the novel. He is a slave who lives on the island with the man who is ostensibly his master. Cruso says that a slaver cut out Friday's tongue many years ago and Cruso never taught Friday any language beyond the most rudimentary instruction. This inability to communicate leaves Friday trapped in a silent world. Friday leaves the island and travels to England but it is only at the novel's end that he comes close to being able to express himself. The journey toward this act of self-expression emerges as the narrative of the novel. Friday attempts to express himself in a number of different ways. He ritually scatters petals on the sea, he plays music on his homemade flute, and he performs frenzied dances. Friday imbues these actions with a private meaning that is unknown to the rest of the world. Susan is the only person who attempts to glean meaning from these actions but she fails to understand their significance. Friday is shut inside his silent world even when he is trying to communicate. Friday eventually learns to write. Though he can only write a single letter over and over, it is the first step toward a shared understanding of Friday's pain. Foe and Susan provide Friday with a voice by teaching him to write. Meaning no longer has to be projected onto Friday's actions. He finally possesses the tools to make the world understand his pain.


Q-3) Is Susan reflecting the white mentality of Crusoe (Robinson Crusoe)?


Through the words of J.M. Coetzee, the character of Susan Barton describes her life during and after her time on the desolate island with Cruso. Barton’s time on “Cruso’s island” is spent in preoccupation with Cruso’s way of life, and life after her rescue is spent in reflection of her relationships with Cruso, Friday, and Foe. This female voice is presented through the words of a male author, J.M. Coetzee, who presents Barton as a submissive supporting actress to the extremely dominant character of Robinson Crusoe. 


Susan Barton, the narrator in Foe, finds herself shipwrecked on a desolate island with a man named Robinson Cruso. It does not take long for Barton to recognize her status on the island after she tells Cruso her story of being washed ashore. She says,


 “I presented myself to Cruso, in the days when he still ruled over the island, and became his second subject, the first being his manservant Friday”. 


Throughout the novel, even long after Cruso’s death, she describes the island as “Cruso’s island.” She finds herself as the mere female companion to the king and his manservant, Friday. Barton rationalises Cruso’s role of king as she sees him “on the Bluff, with the sun behind him all red and purple, staring out to see…I thought: He is a truly kingly figure; he is the true king of the island” . Coetzee makes Barton the woman behind the man, defining her as a “free and autonomous being like all human creatures that finds herself living in a world where men compel her to assume the status of the Other”. Barton is quick to assume the submissive role on the island as the assertive character of Robinson Crusoe takes the lead on the island and in her story.



Q. 4) Who is the Protagonist? (Foe – Susan – Friday – Unnamed narrator)


Susan Barton is Foe's protagonist and storyteller. The story is written in quotation marks, which further emphasises Susan's role in retelling her tale first with Cruso on the island and later with Friday in England. Susan struggles for voice and gradually that voice is rendered voiceless. Although she is European and essentially part of the hegemonic power structure, once she becomes a castaway on Cruso's island she becomes a subaltern character like Friday, both colonised others adhering to Cruso's authority and lifestyle.


Old Man Cruso, although once part of the elite class, becomes far removed from social conformities and expectations. He was at peace with the solitude the island brought him and he had no desire to leave it. Ultimately by the end of his life Cruso represented otherness even if it was by his own choice. His last fever came on at the time of the rescue by Captain John Smith.

Even in this weakened state Cruso resisted leaving his island: But when he was hoisted aboard the Hobart, and smelled the tar, and heard the creak of timbers, he came to himself and fought so hard to be free that it took strong men to master him and convey him below.


Susan's narrative voice is initially strong on Cruso's island. She is inquisitive and implores answers from Cruso. At one point Susan asks him why he had not built a boat: 


"Why in all these years have you not built a boat and made your escape from this island?".


 Cruso responds,

 "And where should I escape to?" 


Susan realises it is a "waste of breath to urge Cruso to save himself". Susan cannot get through to this man and it is the first glimpse of her struggle for voice. Later in the story, Susan struggles with Foe as she did Cruso: 


"Finding it as thankless to argue with Foe as it has been with Cruso, I held my tongue, and soon he fell asleep".


Mr. Foe is the only character that has elite or patriarchal power. He realises Susan is hiding or denying something from her experience in Bahia. As the novel escalates, Foe tries to persuade Susan to disregard her story and envision the possibilities that are in his mind. In doing so. Foe marginalises Susan's voice by insisting on writing the 'other' story that Susan resists telling. Susan struggles to regain control over her own story, persisting that the island tale is significant in and of itself. Her refusal to tell her 'other' story begins to discredit her character and her credibility starts to wane. The emergence of the little girl and the nanny strike a chord with Susan. A dark undercurrent becomes prevalent in the novel and Susan's denial of these characters questions her authority:


But if these women are creatures of yours, visiting me at your instruction, speaking words you have prepared for them, then who am I and who indeed are you?


Friday's voicelessness permeates through the story with a resounding silence that transforms into a voice of its own. Susan attempts to teach Friday his letters by drawing words on a slate. Soon after, Foe and Susan find Friday at the desk making 'rows and rows of the letter o. This exemplifies Friday's voicelessness. Like his mouth, the letter is open in suspended silence, Friday's silence is his choice; a victory of resistance against his postcolonial oppression and it becomes the most significant voice in Foe. Friday's defiance is evident in the last pages of the novel. The narration in the last section of Foe departs from Susan and Mr. Foe to an unidentified narrator that culminates in a pivotal display of metafictional literature. The narrator dives into the wreck and finds Friday:


But this is not a place of words. Each syllable, as it comes out, is caught and filled with water and diffused. This is a place where bodies are their own signs. It is the home of Friday.

Word count: 4503


Flipped learning - Prose Writers and New Poets

Flipped learning- prose writers and new poets

Hello, readers! I am Divya Parmar and I warmly welcome you all to read my blog. In this blog I will write my learning outcome from Flipped learning on three prose writers and New poets. 

Write a note on Raghunathan's views of Indian Culture.
"Change is easy, and as dangerous as it is easy, but stagnation is no less dangerous." Write a note on Raghunathan's views of change.


One of our great journalists, N. Raghunathan of the Hindu became, late in life, the columnist who wrote under 'Sotto Voce and signed himself as 'Vighneswara'. After a life-time of train ing in the exacting discipline of expression in a difficult foreign language, Raghunathan now revealed himself as the perfect humanist and the flawless literary craftsman. As the months and years passed, the 'Sotto Voce' weekly essays, with their tone of quiet assurance and look of effortless ease, became the standard bearer of traditional values and robust sanity in a world of noisy slogans and deafening cries. Raghunathan's was usually the conservative, unpopular, 'diehard' view; his assent with tradition was apt to assume the tone of dissent from current notions of progress; and yet his views couldn't be dismissed as of no con sequence, for the undertones of assent and dissent came with an accent of authority that compelled attention if not acquiescence. The elephant god 'Vighneswara' of the Hindu pantheon is both massive in bulk and slow in gait, but he has an infallible skill in works, he has a steady and clear and whole view of what he has a sense deigns to see, and he has a sense of unruffled commitment to the tasks on hand. He is at once the perfect guide to the world of knowledge and the perfect dispeller of the obstacles to right knowledge. There was thus a certain challenge in Raghunathan's assumption of 'Vighneswara' as his nom-de-plume, but we can now see that the name wasn't taken in vain. 

Raghunathan discontinued the 'Sotto Voce' feature a decade ago, but the series of essays has been collected since in the volumes Sotto Voce: The Coming of Freedom (1959), Our New Rulers (1961), The Avadi Socialists (1964) and Planners' Paradise (1970). He has also published Reason and Intuition in Indian Culture (1969), being his Madras University extension lectures, but the 'essay' seems to be his real forte. Of Bacon's 'essays' it has been said that they might be Minerva's own lucu brations. Of the best essays in the 'Sotto Voce' collections too it could be said that they might be the Elephant God's own sallies of the mind. Whatever the subject-economics, politics, education, social life, literature, music, philosophy-it is touched with the seal of universality. Reading these hundreds of exercises in temporaneous comment after the lapse of many years, one can see the ribbon of stern purpose running through them all. 

Beneath the superfices of contemporary life and the flare-up of sharp opinion and violent action, there is the deep underground river not immediately seen but real all the same which is the true source of vegetation and life on earth. The culture of the people the complex of swabhava, swadharma, swatantra, swarajya that is the true index of this culture-has been the slow creation of the ages, and may not now be crudely tampered with except at the risk of our total discomfiture. Indian 'spiri tuality' isn't something opposed to life and world affirmation. Spirituality is an awakening to the inner or true Reality of our being, and once we have our feet on the Ground of Reality, our everyday movements will be steady with an instinct for poise and a sense of direction. But how does one achieve contact with the Ground? Reason is a wonderful analytical instru ment, but the Base eludes it. Hence the need to invoke the higher-than-mind faculty, which for want of a better term we call intuition. Once the contact with the Ground has been
established, reason may be left to steer the surface movements with sureness and ease. This alliance between intuition and reason -this clue to enlightened and wise.

living-Raghunathan calls viveka. Without the continual exercise of viveka, man would be but a forked animal, a siege of contradictions and frustrations. The integrated man is one who has achieved harmony between himself and the world, his inner and outer life, his thoughts and his words. On the other hand, like the plane that zigzags when taxi-ing and somersaults when taking off, the man afflicted with pramada-the man without viveka-has, a clouded consciousness that knows neither right measure, matra, nor self restraint, dama, but is a prey to egoistic separativity and the misery arising out of it. The task of viveka is to maintain measure between the eternity that is Self and the manifoldness of the phenomenal play. In literature, the particular is so seized with sensibility that the particular itself becomes charged with universality. Literature makes such a feat of transcendence possible because of the alliance of creative imagination and deep sensibi lity, which correspond to the two terms of intuition and reason. 

Just as viveka in action and behaviour lies, not in running away from life's responsibilities, but in mastering and exceeding them, so too aesthetic experience is meant to be, not an escape from life, but rather a seeking after quintessential life, being absorbed in it, and distilling a joy from it akin to the Bliss of Brahman. In setting forth this argument in his lectures, Raghunathan has loaded every rift with the ore of apt scriptural citation. It is the statement of his faith as a Hindu and as a sahridaya, and this is a helpful point of reference to understand the musings and animadversions and gentle exhortations in the 'Sotto Voce'. The Church, the Academy, the Uni versity have at different times fulfilled the role of preserver of the values of culture without preventing legitimate change and healthy growth. Dr. F. R. Leavis says rightly that the University is …...society trying to preserve and develop a continuity of consciousness and a mature directing sense of value-a sense of value informed by a traditional wisdom. The Universities are recognized symbols of cultural tradition-of cultural tradition still conceived as a directing force, representing a wisdom older than modern civilization and having an authority that should check and control the blind drive onward of material and mechanical development.

Write a note on how Kaikini differs from other Indian poets in his poems.

One other poet who moved, in the course of a few years, from one form of utterance to another was P. R. Kaikini. His Flower Offerings (1934) had the sub-title "Prose-Poems on Truth, Beauty and Nature", and it was followed by Songs of a Wanderer: Prose Lyrics (1936). The influence of Tagore was evident:


Yesterday, when my young heart went to bed, it was full of joy, life, love and hope. 
But this morning, when I awoke from strange dreams, I found my heart was wound up with the restless shadows of a struggle within and the vaster darkness of a struggle without, blinded in a storm of blood and water.

The mood soon changed, and Kaikini, instead of singing of "joy and dynamic life", began to scream about "blood and war", and rhythmic prose gave place to free verse. This Civilization (1937), Shanghai (1939). The Recruit (1940), The Snake in the Moon (1942) and Look on Undaunted (1944) were the recordations of Kaikini's response to the changes on the Indian or world scene in the wake of the rake's progress of the Nazis and the militarists and the rape of the masses everywhere. This poetry, wrote Michael Roberts, "looks out at the world of science, politics, and everyday affairs, and it expresses a passionate sense of right and wrong". A natural calamity like the Quetta earthquake of 1935, the sufferings of embattled Shanghai in 1937, the war that Hitler precipitated in 1939, the nadir of human fortunes in 1942-these were Kaikini's themes, and what he saw in this developing world. situation was only disintegration and chaos:

Rivers of blood clotting and germ-infested germ-infested and clotting clotting Rivers and rivers of blood blood warm beating human blood rotting rotting... Time was when wonder shone supreme in our eyes But alas! today shattered and broken we fall. 

In the post-war Poems of the Passionate East (1947), more hopeful notes could be heard, for it looked as though the war ravaged waste land was to be cultivated after all.

In the prefatory note to his the night is heavy (1943), Krishan Shungloo, then a student at Oxford, explained that the "irregular pace of the verse" was chosen deliberately, being "best suited to the violence of our time and the interpretation of my moods. There are 39 poems, numbered but not titled; no rhymes, no capital letters, no punctuation marks; no clutching at false hopes, no spouting forth of cheap sentiment; it is the moan of disillution, naked and unashamed

in courting life i have wedded despair…

i too have rotted in flesh and spirit crucified my love on a harlot's bed

fraulein i mean men and women wearing the mask of life the dead souls of our civilization . . .

we are the god's jest

the cryptic joke

we doubt and have no answer … 

Write a critical note on the poem of Nissim Ezekiel.

Nissim Ezekiel-English is his mother tongue, as it is Dom Moraes's has published five volumes of verse so far: A Time to Change (1951), Sixty Poems (1953), The Third (1959), The Unfinished Man (1960) and The Exact Name (1965). He also edited for a time Poetry India. An artist who is willing to take pains, to cultivate reticence, to pursue the profession of poetry with a sense of commitment, Ezekiel's poems are as a rule lucid-a merit these days-and are splendidly evocative and satisfyingly sensuous. In his first two volumes, persons and places, memories and situations, literary echoes and moments of vision, all inspired Ezekiel to poetic utterance. He was painfully and poignantly aware of the flesh, its insistent urges, its stark ecstasies, its disturbing filiations with the mind. In his later poetry, however, there is revealed a more careful crafts manship, a more marked restraint and a colder, a more con scious intellectuality, than in the first two volumes. There is a gain in quality and integrity, and he is able to achieve conversational directness and ease without losing himself in discursiveness. Obscurity and mere angularity are avoided, and beauty and bareness of statement often go together. The discipline of rhyme and regular stanza form is not shirked, except where special effects are intended, as for example in 'Memo for a Venture': 

Not power nor success not popularity but principle,

a point of view, a passion

like Alexander's

and something of the saint,

from these come plenitude Probe and prodigality song grivig v in gestures of greatness.
In other poems there is bold yet apt phrasing, a verbal sting too when called for, occasionally even a touch of the frivolous or ludicrous (as in 'Very Indian Poem in Indian English'), and general competence in craftsmanship. Although there are hints of sensuality in some of the poems, that is at least not served up as something nobly spiritual. There is a vague striving after wisdom-in the latest volume, there is even a pull towards philosophy-there are feeble attempts at prayer and there are intermittent throbs of frustration. Growing old is shedding illusions, and perhaps hugging new ones. Ezekiel would like us to think that he is wading through middle age, experienc ing the anguish (in Yeats's words) of nd a vol Lo

Ins for The unfinished man and his pain Brought face to face with his own clumsiness… 


Youth's certitudes on the hither shore, mellowed age's unhurried stock-takings on the other shore; and, in between, the trying thirties and the tedious forties and fifties. In a sense, of course, it's man's destiny to be for ever evolving, and hence to be unfinished'. There is a movement, a growth; something is gained. but something is lost also. If the intellect acquires a sharper edge something else perhaps imagination, perhaps hope or self-confidence-suffers in consequence. Between the motion und the act falls the shadow, and so poems like 'Urban and Enterprise' become images of frustration:


It started as a pilgrimage,

Exa ting minds and making all The burdens light. The second stage

Explored but did not test the call. The sun beat down to match our rege.

The pilgrimage has become a weary trek, and when the goal is reached,

We hardly knew why we were there.

The trip has darkened every face,


Our deeds were neither great nor rare. Home is where we have to gather grace

It may be described as a miniature Abubusis; fancy-fed, the goal is alluring; but the process of reaching it empties the victory of its glamour and glory. A Morning Walk' sees the poet wading through Bombay (it could of course be any Indian city), and it is a mortifying experienced : 
Barbaric city sick with slums,

Deprived of seasons, blessed with rains, (Ear) Its hawkers, beggars, iron-lunged, (Tar) or Processions led by frantic drums. A million purgatorial lanes,) anch And child-like masses, many-tongued, be things whose wages are in words and crumbs.

The recurring note in Ezekiel's recent poems is the hurt that urban civilization inflicts on modern man, dehumanizing him, and subjecting his verities to pollution and devaluation. What is offered is dead-sea fruit, what we confront is the Medusa stare. Is there no remedy, then?

The pattern will remain, unless you break It with a sudden jerk...

There is a tautness and austerity in Ezekiel's best verse, and although the thorn of irony pricks now and then, the total effect is cathartic.

“India is not a country”, says Raja Rao, “India is an idea, a metaphysic.” Explain with examples.

It is the unique role of Indo-Anglian literature both to derive from and to promote and all India consciousness. It is perhaps cynocal to talk of ‘national identity’ and of oneness with the mother at a time when the forces have been let loose and linguistic and communal patients are in all over the country.

As Sri Aurobindo pointed out in the article in the Vande Mataram sixty years ago, “the sap that keeps it alive is the realization of the motherhood of God in our country, the vision of the mother, the perpetual contemplation, adoration and service of the mother”. Gandhiji too said at about the same time that the ancient Hindus saw that India was one undivided land so made by nature, that India was one nation, and to bring this home to the people they established holy places in different parts of India.

Our national epic, The Ramayana, is the epic of India; the Mahabharata is a veritable grammar of national literature, and even in Raja Ji’s abridged version in English, it has done a great deal to project a consciousness of ‘national identity.

Post-independence literature in India is rather full of muffled voices or historical cries, and the average writer’s world is filled too much with the irritations, excitements, and frustration of the movement. but there have been expectations too. Bhabani Bhattacharya’s ‘A Goddess name Gold’ is a call of Fidelity and faith addressed to the new Indian nation. In the Mahabharata all roads lead to Kurukshetra; In The Serpent and the Rope, all Road likewise lead to Benares, the eternal city on the banks of a holy river, Ganga. and so Raja Rao says “India is not a country, India in an idea of a metaphysic". 

Word count: 2614 




Youth Festival


Hello, readers! Divya Parmar warmly welcomes you all to read my blog. This blog is based on Amrutrang Urja Mahotsava(youth Festival) 2022. This was the 30th youth Festival which was organised by Maharaja Krishnakumarsinhji Bhavnagar University. Youth Festival was organised for four days 18,19,20,21 September 2022. 
Kalayatra was based on various themes. There were 34 events in the youth festival and around 750 participants.
Shri Mahendrabhai Meghani mukhyamanch. 

After their was opening ceremony and chief guests were collector and yuvraj absent Jitubhai vaghani,Incharge VC MM Trivedi Mayor kirtiben danidharya, Abhishek Jain - director of wrong side raju,Bhartiben shiyal, Kaushik bhatt, Safin Hasan,GM Sutariya sir, EC members.

Dilip Gohil welcomed all guest and audience mkbu's history in youth
Safin Hasan gave a speech for young generation youth to follow ur inspiration, confused generation, lot of options , Example of Patang Youth and Dori in connection with family society and parents are necessary.  

Abhishek Jain thanking Bhavnagar. Request for film school. Bhavnagar being self- sufficient. Youth helps to be fearless. Management skills jugad vruti, Film making kalao nu samagam. More than 300 arts. Never feel inferior. Reels vs Stage, not to hesitate for participation.

Bhartiben said his youth festival is the best platform to showcase the talent and even to develop the skill within us. Jitubhai talked about youth contribution rights and duties, collecting ideas and innovation policy, startup policy, he even said in today's present scenario it's very difficult to get work/ job so it's better to develop our skill. Kaushik Bhatt thanked everyone at last.

Quiz- Shri Harindra Dave Sahityamanch
Garba- Murliben Meghani Nrutyamanch 
Mime- Shri Vinodbhai Amlani Natyamanch 

Mimicri 
Minimum 4 minutes maximum 5 minutes three participants in the event.
Judges were Vipul, Upadhyay, Baraiya 
Events started with college code 3,6,13,15 ,7 and 8 have not presented their event.

Mime
challenge protagonist for revenge to his brother murdered and his was continiously play chopat her father tell her to merry is brother in law (manhur) she recall her memories with his husband beautiful scene they create too woman one after merry waiting for husband and before his dead waiting his husband she was talking with her self by too character she marry with her brother in law (Diyar vatu) but after merriage she getting news that his husband mudrered by his brother so she give poison milk to his brother in law he died. Flashback of murder and fight was very nice main protagonist woman dialogue was amazing

Code 13
Artificial intelligence
Amit Galani director and writen by 
Their are Engineer students one girl's father died and her one friend denied to go to burial and go to exam last paper five friend of her fight go to home or exam one side logic and one side emotions at the end they choose logic and all friends together they not go to home but they are ready to go exam.

Code18
Priyank Jani writer and director about Drama and one director who was now retried recall his past memories and Drama and his actor going to past setting in Mumbai montage of actors journey and flashback about actor and director depacher bahu Gambir Drama it's like fight between Drama and Film ek baju adarshvaadi director his son play role of brain washing of (actor) fari ek vaar aej sharuaat. 

Western solo singing competition 

 21/09/2022
Wednesday
Trophy Distribution and Celebration 


Chief Guest: Chetan Trivedi 
Other Guest: Ishani Dave, Rj Akash 
IG: Ashokbhai Jadhav 
More than 1 lac people watched kalayarta on online platform 
Feedback by three students give their feedback of experience of Youth festival.RJ Akash, and Ishani Dave gave their performance, accordingly. 




The Only Story Worksheet:2

  Work sheet:2  1. Explain the quotation from Julain Barnes’s novel ‘The Only Story’: “Would you rather love the more, and suffer the more; ...